<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Law Times Journal</provider_name><provider_url>https://lawtimesjournal.in</provider_url><author_name>Team @Law Times Journal</author_name><author_url>https://lawtimesjournal.in/author/admin/</author_url><title>Second FIR Based On The Very Same Allegations Cannot Be Registered, More So When The First Fir Has Been Quashed On Merits: Kerala HC - Law Times Journal</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="KgHePW4SSm"&gt;&lt;a href="https://lawtimesjournal.in/second-fir-based-on-the-very-same-allegations-cannot-be-registered-more-so-when-the-first-fir-has-been-quashed-on-merits-kerala-hc/"&gt;Second FIR Based On The Very Same Allegations Cannot Be Registered, More So When The First Fir Has Been Quashed On Merits: Kerala HC&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://lawtimesjournal.in/second-fir-based-on-the-very-same-allegations-cannot-be-registered-more-so-when-the-first-fir-has-been-quashed-on-merits-kerala-hc/embed/#?secret=KgHePW4SSm" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Second FIR Based On The Very Same Allegations Cannot Be Registered, More So When The First Fir Has Been Quashed On Merits: Kerala HC&#x201D; &#x2014; Law Times Journal" data-secret="KgHePW4SSm" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><thumbnail_url>https://lawtimesjournal.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/KERALA-HC-1.png</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>1200</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>628</thumbnail_height><description>The Hon'ble Bench comprising of Hon'ble Justice V.G. Arun was hearing the Criminal Miscellaneous petition against the order of the Enquiry Commissioner. Subsequently, the Hon'ble Special Judge, Thiruvananthapuram while dismissing the complaint filed by the petitioner, V.S. Achyuthanathan, Former Chief Minister of Kerala held that the difference between the previous complaint and present complaint filed is that the present complaint filed contains more details which is also immaterial in the view of the settled legal position that an FIR need not be a compendium of all facts.</description></oembed>
