1.0Law Times Journalhttps://lawtimesjournal.inTejaswi Godahttps://lawtimesjournal.in/author/tejaswi-goda/Issue of conflict b/w A.105(3) and 194(3) and part III of the Constitution pending before seven-judge bench need to be given priority to settle legal principles: SC - Law Times Journalrich600338<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="oUwjocFi9z"><a href="https://lawtimesjournal.in/issue-of-conflict-b-w-a-1053-and-1943-and-part-iii-of-the-constitution-pending-before-seven-judge-bench-need-to-be-given-priority-to-settle-legal-principles-sc/">Issue of conflict b/w A.105(3) and 194(3) and part III of the Constitution pending before seven-judge bench need to be given priority to settle legal principles: SC</a></blockquote><iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://lawtimesjournal.in/issue-of-conflict-b-w-a-1053-and-1943-and-part-iii-of-the-constitution-pending-before-seven-judge-bench-need-to-be-given-priority-to-settle-legal-principles-sc/embed/#?secret=oUwjocFi9z" width="600" height="338" title="“Issue of conflict b/w A.105(3) and 194(3) and part III of the Constitution pending before seven-judge bench need to be given priority to settle legal principles: SC” — Law Times Journal" data-secret="oUwjocFi9z" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"></iframe><script type="text/javascript">
/* <![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&"undefined"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]> */
</script>
https://lawtimesjournal.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/supreme-court-2-696x364-2-1.jpg1200675The Hon'ble supreme court bench comprising Hon'ble Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Hon'ble justice Dinesh Maheshwari, Hon'ble justice Hrishikesh Roy while delivering Judgement in Ajit Mohan V legislative assembly (NCT DELHI) observed that "We find it rather difficult to countenance the plea that the judgment of this Hon'ble Court in MSM Sharma stands whittled down by subsequent judicial pronouncements or that powers, privileges, and immunities under Articles 105(3) and 194(3) of the Constitution