<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Law Times Journal</provider_name><provider_url>https://lawtimesjournal.in</provider_url><author_name>Tejaswi Goda</author_name><author_url>https://lawtimesjournal.in/author/tejaswi-goda/</author_url><title>Investigation under Section 156(3) of CrPC can be ordered before taking cognizance of the offence: SC - Law Times Journal</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="S531y5Bx9l"&gt;&lt;a href="https://lawtimesjournal.in/investigation-under-section-1563-of-crpc-can-be-ordered-before-taking-cognizance-of-the-offence-sc/"&gt;Investigation under Section 156(3) of CrPC can be ordered before taking cognizance of the offence: SC&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://lawtimesjournal.in/investigation-under-section-1563-of-crpc-can-be-ordered-before-taking-cognizance-of-the-offence-sc/embed/#?secret=S531y5Bx9l" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Investigation under Section 156(3) of CrPC can be ordered before taking cognizance of the offence: SC&#x201D; &#x2014; Law Times Journal" data-secret="S531y5Bx9l" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><thumbnail_url>https://lawtimesjournal.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/supreme-court-2-1.png</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>1200</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>628</thumbnail_height><description>The division bench of the Supreme Court comprising Justice Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud and Justice M.R. Shah reiterated the Judgement of the Supreme Court in Sushila Aggarwal versus. State (NCT of Delhi) where the court held that "while granting the order of anticipatory bail the court has to take into account of the role of the person and the likelihood of his influencing the course of the investigation and so on" and held accordingly regarding granting of anticipatory bail that</description></oembed>
