<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Law Times Journal</provider_name><provider_url>https://lawtimesjournal.in</provider_url><author_name>SHIKHA MISHRA</author_name><author_url>https://lawtimesjournal.in/author/shikha-mishra/</author_url><title>Parties are not taking civil proceedings seriously because courts are so lax-SC - Law Times Journal</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="OUVw1sm6FO"&gt;&lt;a href="https://lawtimesjournal.in/parties-are-not-taking-civil-proceedings-seriously-because-courts-are-so-lax-sc/"&gt;Parties are not taking civil proceedings seriously because courts are so lax-SC&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://lawtimesjournal.in/parties-are-not-taking-civil-proceedings-seriously-because-courts-are-so-lax-sc/embed/#?secret=OUVw1sm6FO" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Parties are not taking civil proceedings seriously because courts are so lax-SC&#x201D; &#x2014; Law Times Journal" data-secret="OUVw1sm6FO" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><thumbnail_url>https://lawtimesjournal.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/download-8-1.jpg</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>1200</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>675</thumbnail_height><description>Justice Chandrachud and Justice M. R. Shah's bench was hearing a special leave petition against the Delhi High Court verdict confirming the trial court's order for trial under Order 11 Rule 21, CPC. The order under Rule 21 was passed due to the failure of Hindustan Zinc, failure to follow an instruction under Rule 11 Rule 12 entered into between BHEL and the defendant, for the discovery of the work protocol.</description></oembed>
