<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Law Times Journal</provider_name><provider_url>https://lawtimesjournal.in</provider_url><author_name>Navya Singh</author_name><author_url>https://lawtimesjournal.in/author/navya-singh/</author_url><title>Amazon-Future Case: Clarity towards the Stance of Emergency Arbitrator in Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="aUUImPWkty"&gt;&lt;a href="https://lawtimesjournal.in/amazon-future-case-clarity-towards-the-stance-of-emergency-arbitrator-in-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996/"&gt;Amazon-Future Case: Clarity towards the Stance of Emergency Arbitrator in Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://lawtimesjournal.in/amazon-future-case-clarity-towards-the-stance-of-emergency-arbitrator-in-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996/embed/#?secret=aUUImPWkty" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Amazon-Future Case: Clarity towards the Stance of Emergency Arbitrator in Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996&#x201D; &#x2014; Law Times Journal" data-secret="aUUImPWkty" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><thumbnail_url>https://lawtimesjournal.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/reliance-1.jpg</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>1200</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>628</thumbnail_height><description>As, there has been inordinate delay in the disposal of cases in Indian courts, and therefore, clarity in the stance of emergency arbitrator has provided not only huge relief to the parties, who have a seat of arbitration in India but also induce other parties to adopt arbitration as a dispute resolution mechanism.</description></oembed>
