1.0Law Times Journalhttps://lawtimesjournal.inTeam @Law Times Journalhttps://lawtimesjournal.in/author/admin/Delay Furnishing Instructions To GA/AGA By Concerned Officials In Cases Of Bail Applications Violate Article 21 Of The Accused: Allahabad High Courtrich600338<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="Aq3bbntStV"><a href="https://lawtimesjournal.in/delay-furnishing-instructions-to-ga-aga-by-concerned-officials-in-cases-of-bail-applications-violate-article-21-of-the-accused-allahabad-high-court/">Delay Furnishing Instructions To GA/AGA By Concerned Officials In Cases Of Bail Applications Violate Article 21 Of The Accused: Allahabad High Court</a></blockquote><iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://lawtimesjournal.in/delay-furnishing-instructions-to-ga-aga-by-concerned-officials-in-cases-of-bail-applications-violate-article-21-of-the-accused-allahabad-high-court/embed/#?secret=Aq3bbntStV" width="600" height="338" title="“Delay Furnishing Instructions To GA/AGA By Concerned Officials In Cases Of Bail Applications Violate Article 21 Of The Accused: Allahabad High Court” — Law Times Journal" data-secret="Aq3bbntStV" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"></iframe><script type="text/javascript">
/* <![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&"undefined"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]> */
</script>
https://lawtimesjournal.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/allahabad-hc-1-696x364-3.jpg1200628The Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the instant case reiterated that the right of an accused to have his bail application heard by the Court within a reasonable time has been entrenched as constitutional liberty. It further stated by the Hon'ble court that according to pronouncements of Constitutional Courts, the right flows from Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. (Ajeet Chaudhary Versus. The State of U.P. and another reported at 2021 (1) ADJ 559).