<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Law Times Journal</provider_name><provider_url>https://lawtimesjournal.in</provider_url><author_name>Swikritimala Dubey</author_name><author_url>https://lawtimesjournal.in/author/swikritimala-dubey/</author_url><title>Supreme Court said: welfare of child is of paramount importance</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="c33BqrERyn"&gt;&lt;a href="https://lawtimesjournal.in/supreme-court-said-welfare-of-child-is-of-paramount-importance/"&gt;Supreme Court said: welfare of child is of paramount importance&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://lawtimesjournal.in/supreme-court-said-welfare-of-child-is-of-paramount-importance/embed/#?secret=c33BqrERyn" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Supreme Court said: welfare of child is of paramount importance&#x201D; &#x2014; Law Times Journal" data-secret="c33BqrERyn" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><thumbnail_url>https://lawtimesjournal.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Child-Custody-1.jpg</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>1200</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>628</thumbnail_height><description>Supreme Court bench comprising of Justice Dr. D Y Chandrachud, Justice Indu Malhotra and Justice Indira Banerjee in the case of Mrs. Ritika Sharan v. Mr. Sujoy Ghosh, while deciding the Jurisdiction of the Hindu Marriage Dispute and the Guardianship held that the Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under Article 142 of the Constitution is a to ease up the Constitutional Instrument to advance Justice and further said that &#x201C;the welfare of the child is of paramount importance&#x201D;.</description></oembed>
