<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Law Times Journal</provider_name><provider_url>https://lawtimesjournal.in</provider_url><author_name>Shubhi Shukla</author_name><author_url>https://lawtimesjournal.in/author/shubhi-shukla/</author_url><title>SC nullified Kerala HC direction on sec. 173(2) Cr.P.C for removal of accusedSC nullified Kerala HC direction on sec. 173(2) Cr. P.C for removal of accused - Law Times Journal</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="1UGpuyGrec"&gt;&lt;a href="https://lawtimesjournal.in/sc-nullified-kerala-hc-direction-on-sec-1732-cr-p-c-for-removal-of-accused/"&gt;SC nullified Kerala HC direction on sec. 173(2) Cr. P.C for removal of accused&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://lawtimesjournal.in/sc-nullified-kerala-hc-direction-on-sec-1732-cr-p-c-for-removal-of-accused/embed/#?secret=1UGpuyGrec" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;SC nullified Kerala HC direction on sec. 173(2) Cr. P.C for removal of accused&#x201D; &#x2014; Law Times Journal" data-secret="1UGpuyGrec" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><thumbnail_url>https://lawtimesjournal.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/supreme-court-1-1-696x364-1.jpg</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>1291</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>675</thumbnail_height><description>The Supreme Court held that there should be no effect given to the direction of Kerala HC for the deletion of parties from the array of the accused in the final report.</description></oembed>
