A division bench held that the first appellate court is the last court in terms of facts

1.0Law Times Journalhttps://lawtimesjournal.inMihir Popathttps://lawtimesjournal.in/author/mihir-popat/A division bench held that the first appellate court is the last court in terms of facts - Law Times Journalrich600338<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="ndNBX8nxDA"><a href="https://lawtimesjournal.in/a-division-bench-held-that-the-first-appellate-court-is-the-last-court-in-terms-of-facts/">A division bench held that the first appellate court is the last court in terms of facts</a></blockquote><iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://lawtimesjournal.in/a-division-bench-held-that-the-first-appellate-court-is-the-last-court-in-terms-of-facts/embed/#?secret=ndNBX8nxDA" width="600" height="338" title="“A division bench held that the first appellate court is the last court in terms of facts” — Law Times Journal" data-secret="ndNBX8nxDA" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"></iframe><script type="text/javascript"> /* <![CDATA[ */ /*! This file is auto-generated */ !function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&"undefined"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document); /* ]]> */ </script> https://lawtimesjournal.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/download-41.jpg1200628The Supreme Court has once again reiterated that the High Court should not interfere with the decision of the first appellate court using its jurisdiction under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) unless a broad question of law is involved.