1.0Law Times Journalhttps://lawtimesjournal.inSHIKHA MISHRAhttps://lawtimesjournal.in/author/shikha-mishra/Maratha Reservation: SC issues notice to all states, will consider if Mandal commission decision be reconsidered?rich600338<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="beS8FWnuA1"><a href="https://lawtimesjournal.in/maratha-reservation-sc-issues-notice-to-all-states-will-consider-if-mandal-commission-decision-be-reconsidered/">Maratha Reservation: SC issues notice to all states, will consider if Mandal commission decision be reconsidered?</a></blockquote><iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://lawtimesjournal.in/maratha-reservation-sc-issues-notice-to-all-states-will-consider-if-mandal-commission-decision-be-reconsidered/embed/#?secret=beS8FWnuA1" width="600" height="338" title="“Maratha Reservation: SC issues notice to all states, will consider if Mandal commission decision be reconsidered?” — Law Times Journal" data-secret="beS8FWnuA1" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"></iframe><script type="text/javascript">
/* <![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&"undefined"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]> */
</script>
https://lawtimesjournal.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Mandal-Commission-Case.jpg1200672Noting the Maharashtra government's claim that the principal question of the principle of interpretation of the 102nd Constitutional Amendment would affect the legislative competence of all states, the Supreme Court on Monday issued notice to all states in the Maratha reservation case and The hearing was adjourned till 15 March. A five-judge bench headed by Justice Ashok Bhushan said AG K K Venugopal also held the view that the states should be heard. The bench considered that the issues that arise for its consideration are whether the Indra Sawhney judgment (Mandal Commission case) needs to be reconsidered by a larger bench, whether the said decision covers the issue of Maratha reservation, whether The 102nd Amendment affects the federal structure that deprives states of their structure in relation to the SEBC.