1.0Law Times Journalhttps://lawtimesjournal.inChandra Lekhahttps://lawtimesjournal.in/author/chandra-lekha/Anticipatory Bail Petition Maintainable Even After Notice Served Under Section 41-A Of Cr.P.C : Karnataka HC - Law Times Journalrich600338<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="2BItCPBJhY"><a href="https://lawtimesjournal.in/anticipatory-bail-petition-maintainable-even-after-notice-served-under-section-41-a-of-cr-p-c-karnataka-hc/">Anticipatory Bail Petition Maintainable Even After Notice Served Under Section 41-A Of Cr.P.C : Karnataka HC</a></blockquote><iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://lawtimesjournal.in/anticipatory-bail-petition-maintainable-even-after-notice-served-under-section-41-a-of-cr-p-c-karnataka-hc/embed/#?secret=2BItCPBJhY" width="600" height="338" title="“Anticipatory Bail Petition Maintainable Even After Notice Served Under Section 41-A Of Cr.P.C : Karnataka HC” — Law Times Journal" data-secret="2BItCPBJhY" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"></iframe><script type="text/javascript">
/* <![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&"undefined"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]> */
</script>
https://lawtimesjournal.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/karnataka-hc-1.jpg1200625The Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in a plea seeking pre-arrest bail opined that the apprehension of arrest still exists even after issuing notice under Section 41-A of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (hereinafter referred as "Cr. P.C, 1973") and held that the courts ought not to deny an application for Anticipatory Bail under Section. 438 of Cr. P.C, 1973 in such circumstances.