<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Law Times Journal</provider_name><provider_url>https://lawtimesjournal.in</provider_url><author_name>Sakshi Patil</author_name><author_url>https://lawtimesjournal.in/author/sakshi-patil/</author_url><title>Hate Speech Repudiates Right To Equality In A Polity Committed To Pluralism: Supreme Court</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="IVv8W0jacv"&gt;&lt;a href="https://lawtimesjournal.in/hate-speech-repudiates-right-to-equality-in-a-polity-committed-to-pluralism-supreme-court/"&gt;Hate Speech Repudiates Right To Equality In A Polity Committed To Pluralism: Supreme Court&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://lawtimesjournal.in/hate-speech-repudiates-right-to-equality-in-a-polity-committed-to-pluralism-supreme-court/embed/#?secret=IVv8W0jacv" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Hate Speech Repudiates Right To Equality In A Polity Committed To Pluralism: Supreme Court&#x201D; &#x2014; Law Times Journal" data-secret="IVv8W0jacv" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><thumbnail_url>https://lawtimesjournal.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Hate-speech.jpg</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>1200</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>628</thumbnail_height><description>Justices A M Khanwilkar and Sanjay Khanna discusses the distinctions between 'hate speech' and 'free speech', the need to criminalize 'hate speech' and 'free speech', the need to criminalize 'hate speech' and the tests to identify it.</description></oembed>
