<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Law Times Journal</provider_name><provider_url>https://lawtimesjournal.in</provider_url><author_name>Oshin Joshi</author_name><author_url>https://lawtimesjournal.in/author/oshin-joshi/</author_url><title>Karnataka HC: Removes clause assessing students on last semester marks - Law Times Journal</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="ZEG0iLF1sS"&gt;&lt;a href="https://lawtimesjournal.in/karnataka-hc-removes-clause-assessing-students-on-last-semester-marks/"&gt;Karnataka HC: Removes clause assessing students on last semester marks&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://lawtimesjournal.in/karnataka-hc-removes-clause-assessing-students-on-last-semester-marks/embed/#?secret=ZEG0iLF1sS" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Karnataka HC: Removes clause assessing students on last semester marks&#x201D; &#x2014; Law Times Journal" data-secret="ZEG0iLF1sS" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><thumbnail_url>https://lawtimesjournal.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/1606581055_XvlP5f_Exam.jpg</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>1200</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>675</thumbnail_height><description>The Karnataka High Court fairly recently did away with Clause 7 of the guidelines that were issued by the Karnataka State Law University according to which any candidate who secures less than forty per cent of marks as of an aggregate percentage system of the total performance which is inclusive of theory and internal assessment of marks in the previous semesters shall be called as &#x2018;fail&#x2019;.</description></oembed>
