1.0Law Times Journalhttps://lawtimesjournal.inTeam @Law Times Journalhttps://lawtimesjournal.in/author/admin/Direction by the Supreme Court on the order of Madras HC related to the implementation of reservation in NEET-AIQ - Law Times Journalrich600338<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="1OrX9mC9kR"><a href="https://lawtimesjournal.in/direction-by-the-supreme-court-on-the-order-of-madras-hc-related-to-the-implementation-of-reservation-in-neet-aiq/">Direction by the SC on the order of Madras HC related to the implementation of reservation in NEET-AIQ</a></blockquote><iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://lawtimesjournal.in/direction-by-the-supreme-court-on-the-order-of-madras-hc-related-to-the-implementation-of-reservation-in-neet-aiq/embed/#?secret=1OrX9mC9kR" width="600" height="338" title="“Direction by the SC on the order of Madras HC related to the implementation of reservation in NEET-AIQ” — Law Times Journal" data-secret="1OrX9mC9kR" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"></iframe><script type="text/javascript">
/* <![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&"undefined"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]> */
</script>
https://lawtimesjournal.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/supreme-court-1-3-1-2.jpg1200675A bench comprising Justice Chandrachud and BV Nagarathna held that the Madras High Court's observations were supernumerary. The bench is aforementioned that the supreme court quashed the observation created by the judicature of Madras during which it was being aforementioned that reservation for EWS can not be enforced while not the previous consent of the constitutional bench of the supreme court, examination of 103rd constitution modification for economic reservation.