1.0Law Times Journalhttps://lawtimesjournal.inRia Nairhttps://lawtimesjournal.in/author/ria-nair/When Writ Appeal Partly Allowed And SB’s Order Modified, Contempt Plea For Disobedience Of Order Maintainable Only Before Division Bench: Madras HCrich600338<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="16HevlqZ9f"><a href="https://lawtimesjournal.in/when-writ-appeal-partly-allowed-and-sbs-order-modified-contempt-plea-for-disobedience-of-order-maintainable-only-before-division-bench-madras-hc/">When Writ Appeal Partly Allowed And SB’s Order Modified, Contempt Plea For Disobedience Of Order Maintainable Only Before Division Bench: Madras HC</a></blockquote><iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://lawtimesjournal.in/when-writ-appeal-partly-allowed-and-sbs-order-modified-contempt-plea-for-disobedience-of-order-maintainable-only-before-division-bench-madras-hc/embed/#?secret=16HevlqZ9f" width="600" height="338" title="“When Writ Appeal Partly Allowed And SB’s Order Modified, Contempt Plea For Disobedience Of Order Maintainable Only Before Division Bench: Madras HC” — Law Times Journal" data-secret="16HevlqZ9f" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"></iframe><script type="text/javascript">
/* <![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&"undefined"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]> */
</script>
https://lawtimesjournal.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/madras-hc-1.png1200628The Madras High Court, earlier on Wednesday ruled that once a Writ Petition has been partly allowed or an order has been passed modifying the order of the Single Judge, the latter mergers with the order passed in the Writ Appeal and declared that the Doctrine of Merger does not make distinction between orders. It also remarked that if such an order is violated or disobeyed, then a Contempt Petition can be maintained before the Division Bench and not before the Single Judge. This was observed in the case of All India Union Bank Officer v. Brajeshwar Sharma.