1.0Law Times Journalhttps://lawtimesjournal.inAnanya Bhartihttps://lawtimesjournal.in/author/ananya-bharti/rich600338<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="IZw9MsoH9c"><a href="https://lawtimesjournal.in/noncompliance-with-default-clauses-is-no-ground-for-bail-in-the-pocso-trail/">Noncompliance with default clauses is no ground for bail in the POCSO trail</a></blockquote><iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://lawtimesjournal.in/noncompliance-with-default-clauses-is-no-ground-for-bail-in-the-pocso-trail/embed/#?secret=IZw9MsoH9c" width="600" height="338" title="“Noncompliance with default clauses is no ground for bail in the POCSO trail” — Law Times Journal" data-secret="IZw9MsoH9c" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"></iframe><script type="text/javascript"> /* <![CDATA[ */ /*! This file is auto-generated */ !function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&"undefined"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document); /* ]]> */ </script> https://lawtimesjournal.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/nationalherald_2019-07_1c34afc6-8d43-4187-86e0-e16da13e05b4_POCSO.jpg1200675The Hon'ble bench headed by Justice B V Nagarathna of Karnataka High Court has held that non-completion of recording of evidence of the child within 30 days and trial by the special court within the stipulated time as prescribed under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as "POCSO, 2012") under section 35 cannot be a ground to grant bail to the accused.