<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Law Times Journal</provider_name><provider_url>https://lawtimesjournal.in</provider_url><author_name>Sayandeep Chakraborty</author_name><author_url>https://lawtimesjournal.in/author/sayandeep-chakraborty/</author_url><title>Lalman Shukla vs. Gauri Dutt, 1913 40 ALJ 489 - Law Times Journal Lalman Shukla v. Gauri Dutta</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="ArAkIK7ltx"&gt;&lt;a href="https://lawtimesjournal.in/lalman-shukla-vs-gauri-dutt-1913-40-alj-489/"&gt;Lalman Shukla vs. Gauri Dutt, 1913 40 ALJ 489&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://lawtimesjournal.in/lalman-shukla-vs-gauri-dutt-1913-40-alj-489/embed/#?secret=ArAkIK7ltx" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Lalman Shukla vs. Gauri Dutt, 1913 40 ALJ 489&#x201D; &#x2014; Law Times Journal" data-secret="ArAkIK7ltx" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><thumbnail_url>https://lawtimesjournal.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/case-law-1-638-1.jpg</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>1200</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>628</thumbnail_height><description>Lalman Shukla vs. Gauri Dutt continues to be one of the most widely cited cases in contract law. It was one of the earliest cases in India dealing with the aspects of general offer, consent, and acceptance. The Indian Contract Act was legislated in the year 1872, and this case of 1913 remains one of the earliest cases in which the provisions of this act were weighed and interpreted.</description></oembed>
