<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Law Times Journal</provider_name><provider_url>https://lawtimesjournal.in</provider_url><author_name>Swikritimala Dubey</author_name><author_url>https://lawtimesjournal.in/author/swikritimala-dubey/</author_url><title>Apex court stays operation of HC order to restrain MP physical Polls</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="Uw6FTBBj4Z"&gt;&lt;a href="https://lawtimesjournal.in/apex-court-stays-the-operation-of-hc-order-to-restrain-mp-physical-polls/"&gt;Apex court stays the operation of HC order to restrain MP physical Polls&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://lawtimesjournal.in/apex-court-stays-the-operation-of-hc-order-to-restrain-mp-physical-polls/embed/#?secret=Uw6FTBBj4Z" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Apex court stays the operation of HC order to restrain MP physical Polls&#x201D; &#x2014; Law Times Journal" data-secret="Uw6FTBBj4Z" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><thumbnail_url>https://lawtimesjournal.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/supreme-court-2.png</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>1200</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>628</thumbnail_height><description>The Supreme Court of India stayed order of Madhya Pradesh HC order putting restrictions on physical gatherings of political parties for campaign in polls. Supreme Court bench consisting Justices AM Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari &amp; Sanjiv Khanna passed a stay order in pleas filed by BJP leader Pradyuman Singh Tomar , Munna Lal Goyal &amp; ECI against the order of MP High Court. The court also said that it depends on the parties to conduct the election in free &amp; fair manner.</description></oembed>
