<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Law Times Journal</provider_name><provider_url>https://lawtimesjournal.in</provider_url><author_name>Sneh Somani</author_name><author_url>https://lawtimesjournal.in/author/sneh-somani/</author_url><title>Telephonic Message Which Does Not Specify The Offence, Cannot Be Treated As An FIR: SC - Law Times Journal</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="nXgtcAz4ih"&gt;&lt;a href="https://lawtimesjournal.in/telephonic-message-which-does-not-specify-the-offence-cannot-be-treated-as-an-fir-sc/"&gt;Telephonic Message Which Does Not Specify The Offence, Cannot Be Treated As An FIR: SC&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://lawtimesjournal.in/telephonic-message-which-does-not-specify-the-offence-cannot-be-treated-as-an-fir-sc/embed/#?secret=nXgtcAz4ih" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Telephonic Message Which Does Not Specify The Offence, Cannot Be Treated As An FIR: SC&#x201D; &#x2014; Law Times Journal" data-secret="nXgtcAz4ih" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><thumbnail_url>https://lawtimesjournal.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/images-4.jpg</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>1200</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>625</thumbnail_height><description>The Hon'ble SC observed that a telephonic message which does not specify the offence so committed, cannot be treated as an FIR. In the present matter, three accused were convicted for the offence of murder by the Hon'ble HC. Whereas in the Hon'ble Trial Court had acquitted two of the accused and convicted one of the accused of the offence of murder.</description></oembed>
