<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Law Times Journal</provider_name><provider_url>https://lawtimesjournal.in</provider_url><author_name>Priyanshi Budholia</author_name><author_url>https://lawtimesjournal.in/author/priyanshi-budholia/</author_url><title>Jharkhand HC Observed that Retrospective Application Of 10% EWS Quota Is Against Articles 14 &amp; 16 Of The Constitution</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="aGCYFWlCx8"&gt;&lt;a href="https://lawtimesjournal.in/jharkhand-hc-observed-that-retrospective-application-of-10-ews-quota-is-against-articles-14-16-of-the-constitution/"&gt;Jharkhand HC Observed that Retrospective Application Of 10% EWS Quota Is Against Articles 14 &amp; 16 Of The Constitution&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://lawtimesjournal.in/jharkhand-hc-observed-that-retrospective-application-of-10-ews-quota-is-against-articles-14-16-of-the-constitution/embed/#?secret=aGCYFWlCx8" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Jharkhand HC Observed that Retrospective Application Of 10% EWS Quota Is Against Articles 14 &amp; 16 Of The Constitution&#x201D; &#x2014; Law Times Journal" data-secret="aGCYFWlCx8" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><thumbnail_url>https://lawtimesjournal.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Jharkhand-HC-2-1.jpg</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>1200</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>628</thumbnail_height><description>On Thursday, the Jharkhand High Court set aside a 2019 advertisement published by the Jharkhand Public Service Commission, retrospectively demanding the reservation of the 10 percent Economically Weaker Group (EWS) by combining the previous vacancies of 2013 and 2015 with those resulting from the implementation of the said reservation in 2019.</description></oembed>
