<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Law Times Journal</provider_name><provider_url>https://lawtimesjournal.in</provider_url><author_name>Devika Paliwal</author_name><author_url>https://lawtimesjournal.in/author/devika-paliwal/</author_url><title>SC: &#x2018;Ten Times Penalty&#x2019; Prescribed For Deficit Stamp Duty Cannot Be Mechanically Imposed</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="uFFaUqAFWY"&gt;&lt;a href="https://lawtimesjournal.in/sc-ten-times-penalty-prescribed-for-deficit-stamp-duty-cannot-be-mechanically-imposed/"&gt;SC: &#x2018;Ten Times Penalty&#x2019; Prescribed For Deficit Stamp Duty Cannot Be Mechanically Imposed&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://lawtimesjournal.in/sc-ten-times-penalty-prescribed-for-deficit-stamp-duty-cannot-be-mechanically-imposed/embed/#?secret=uFFaUqAFWY" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;SC: &#x2018;Ten Times Penalty&#x2019; Prescribed For Deficit Stamp Duty Cannot Be Mechanically Imposed&#x201D; &#x2014; Law Times Journal" data-secret="uFFaUqAFWY" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><thumbnail_url>https://lawtimesjournal.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/supreme-court-2.png</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>1200</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>628</thumbnail_height><description>The SC has observed that the penalty of ten times prescribed under section 40(1) (b) of the Indian Stamp Act cannot be mechanically imposed.A bench comprising of Justices Ashok Bhushan MR Shah and R. Subhash Reddy observed that the reason such as fraud or deceit in order to deprive the undue enrichment are relevant factors to arrive at a decision as to what should be the extent of penalty under section 40(1) (b).</description></oembed>
