1.0Law Times Journalhttps://lawtimesjournal.inTejaswi Godahttps://lawtimesjournal.in/author/tejaswi-goda/Substantial question of law in a second appeal is mandatory not just a formality u/s 100 CPC: SC - Law Times Journalrich600338<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="EKXNU5hDcE"><a href="https://lawtimesjournal.in/substantial-question-of-law-in-a-second-appeal-is-mandatory-not-just-a-formality-u-s-100-cpc-sc/">Substantial question of law in a second appeal is mandatory not just a formality u/s 100 CPC: SC</a></blockquote><iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://lawtimesjournal.in/substantial-question-of-law-in-a-second-appeal-is-mandatory-not-just-a-formality-u-s-100-cpc-sc/embed/#?secret=EKXNU5hDcE" width="600" height="338" title="“Substantial question of law in a second appeal is mandatory not just a formality u/s 100 CPC: SC” — Law Times Journal" data-secret="EKXNU5hDcE" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"></iframe><script type="text/javascript">
/* <![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&"undefined"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]> */
</script>
https://lawtimesjournal.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/supreme-court-2-696x364-1-1.jpg1200675“On a clear reading of the judgment of the high court, it is clear that there is no substantial question of law framed by the said court which is mandatory in the second appeal, and also it is beyond dispute that the trial court and court of the first appeal concurred on judgments along with which the respondent complied,” the Hon'ble bench, which included Hon'ble justice K.M. Joseph and Hon'ble justice S. Ravindra Bhat, held. Based on all the above said statements judgment of the high court is herein set aside.”