1.0Law Times Journalhttps://lawtimesjournal.inPurnima Ojhahttps://lawtimesjournal.in/author/purnima-ojha/Mumbai Court convicts’ man under POCSO: Google's definition of not including bum as 'private part' may not be acceptable in Indian contextrich600338<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="kLN8blzhkf"><a href="https://lawtimesjournal.in/mumbai-court-convicts-man-under-pocso-googles-definition-of-not-including-bum-as-private-part-may-not-be-acceptable-in-the-indian-context/">Mumbai Court convicts’ man under POCSO: Google’s definition of not including bum as ‘private part’ may not be acceptable in the Indian context</a></blockquote><iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://lawtimesjournal.in/mumbai-court-convicts-man-under-pocso-googles-definition-of-not-including-bum-as-private-part-may-not-be-acceptable-in-the-indian-context/embed/#?secret=kLN8blzhkf" width="600" height="338" title="“Mumbai Court convicts’ man under POCSO: Google’s definition of not including bum as ‘private part’ may not be acceptable in the Indian context” — Law Times Journal" data-secret="kLN8blzhkf" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"></iframe><script type="text/javascript">
/* <![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&"undefined"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]> */
</script>
https://lawtimesjournal.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/POSCO.jpg1200628The Court held that Google's definition of not including bum in the private part may not be an acceptable interpretation as far as Indians are concerned, clarifying that "the term private part is to be interpreted in the context of what it means in our society".